data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b288c/b288c60832fca96d50b4ef5903b44193d0061aab" alt=""
I read lady's version first. There wasn't any good reason but I somehow felt that I had to read that first, and later I realised that I was right to do so because man's version had something more than lady's. Anyway, when I finished reading lady's version, I couldn't help myself from searching for the movie, as there were so many images floating around my head, desperately wanting to be captured. I just wanted to sort out those images, as the book was (espcially for lady's version) considerably descriptive.
And the movie didn't disappoint me. The scenary of Firenze fasinated me. I was mesmerised by the OST of the movie, which mainly was orchestrial, with few other musical instruments coming into play such as guitar. Even though I had known the plot, I was as nervous as a first-timer, probably because all the critical factors that make up the movie was very well coordinated.
I don't even dare to start on the storyline or how I feel about the movie in detail, because I know that would take me several hours. One thing I can confidently say is this: strongly recommended.
댓글 1개:
David, good start to your blog. I am intrigued by novels with a hook like the one you describe, such as having been written from the intertwining points of view of various characters. When I get a chance, I'll look for the books. I am curious; did you think that the movie was able to capture the effect of two novels written from different perspectives?
댓글 쓰기